The National Tennis Rating Program (NTRP), which defines the characteristics
of a players levels, is the official system for determining the
levels of competition for the USTA Jr.TeamTennis League. Each section
association will determine the appropriate use of their ranking system
to distinguish between Intermediate and Advanced level for any players,
across all age categories, who participate in sanctioned tournaments.
Players
in the USTA Jr.TeamTennis or Adult Leagues without a rating must self-rate
or have their team coach/manager rate them in accordance with the NTRP
guidelines. Factors such as a players on-court performance, tennis
background, and any additional information should be considered in the
self-rating decision.When players are rating themselves and question
at which level they should play, they should placethemselves in the
higher NTRP level of play.
Players who are good athletes or intend to spend a great deal of time
taking lessons and practicing should be aware that their improvement
may be significant enough to surpass their original self-rating by the
time they reach the end of the local league season or championship level.
If players anticipate their play level will be higher by the time of
a championship event, they should enter at a higher level of play at
the beginning of the local team season to ensure eligibility.
To place yourself: Begin with 1.0. Read all categories carefully and
then decide which one best describes your present ability level. Be
certain that you qualify on all points of all preceding levels as well
as those in the level you choose.When rating yourself, assume you are
playing against a player of the same gender and the same ability.
| General
Characteristics of NTRP Playing Levels |
|
1.0
|
Player
is just starting to play tennis. |
|
1.5
|
Player has limited experience and is working primarily on getting
the ball in play.
Note to team coach/manager: Player needs to coordinate moving when
hitting the ball. In fact, player is still concentrating on getting
the ball over the net from a stationary position. Player is learning
to serve and keep score. |
|
2.0
|
Player
lacks court experience and their strokes need developing. Player
is familiar with the basic positions for singles and doubles play.
Note to team coach/manager: Player is now beginning to coordinate
footwork but is not consistent in hitting the ball over the net.
Player can serve to some degree, understands scoring as well as
correct positions for serving and receiving, and has limited success
with volleys. |
|
2.5
|
Player
is learning to judge where the ball is going, although their court
coverage is limited. Player can sustain a short rally of slow pace
with other
players of the same ability.
Note to team coach/manager: Player can keep score unassisted, can
call own lines, can serve overhand from the baseline, and has an
understanding of the basic rules. |
|
3.0
|
Player
is fairly consistent when hitting medium-paced shots, but is not
comfortable with all strokes and lacks execution when trying for
directional
control, depth, or power. The most common doubles formation is one-up,
one-back.
Note to team coach/manager: Player is improving court coverage and
can sustain a rally and serve with consistency. On ground strokes,
player needs to improve control of height, depth, direction, and
speed. |
|
3.5
|
Player
has achieved improved stroke dependability with directional control
on moderate shots, but needs to develop depth and variety. They
exhibit more aggressive net play, have improved court coverage,
and are developing teamwork in doubles.
Note to team coach/manager: Player is starting to recognize opportunities
to attack short balls by coming to net. Player is developing more
spin and power on the serve and seldom double faults. |
|
4.0
|
Player
has dependable strokes, including directional control and depth
on both forehand and backhand sides on moderate-paced shots. Player
can use lobs, overheads, approach shots, and volleys with some success
and occasionally forces errors when serving. Rallies may be lost
due to impatience. Teamwork in doubles is evident.
Note to team coach/manager: Player has added variety in shot selection
by using lobs, overheads, volleys, and approach shots with some
success. Player can develop a game plan. |
|
4.5
|
Player has developed use of power and spin and can handle pace.
Player has sound footwork, can control depth of shots, and attempts
to vary their game plan according to your opponents. Player can
hit first serves with power and accuracy and place the second serve.They
tend to over hit on difficult shots. Aggressive net play is common
in doubles.
Note to team coach/manager: Player is developing an offensive weapon. |
|
5.0
|
Player has good shot anticipation and frequently has an outstanding
shot or attribute around which a game may be structured. They can
regularly hit
winners or force errors off of short balls and can put away volleys.
Player can successfully execute lobs, drop shots, half volleys,
overhead smashes, and has good depth and spin on most second serves.
Note to team coach/manager: Player is match-wise and uses shots
that have a high percentage of success in both singles and doubles. |
|
5.5
|
Player has mastered power and/or consistency as a major weapon.
They can vary strategies and styles of play in a competitive situation
and hit
dependable shots in a stress situation. Player has had intensive
training for national tournament competition at the junior and collegiate
levels and has
obtained a sectional and/or national ranking. |
|
6.0
to 7.0
|
Player has had intensive training for national tournament competition
at the junior and collegiate levels and has obtained a sectional
and/or national ranking. |
|